OUR NETWORK:TiVo Community TechLore Sling Community My DigitalEntertainer MediaSmart Home See all... About UsAdvertiseContact Us

iPhone: The Roar of Static

“Don’t believe the hype!”Lines to buy the iPhone
Public Enemy 1988

“Hic Rhodus, hic salta”
Geog W. F. Hegel, 1821 (meaning: “Enough hot air, show us now.”)

The iPhone hype is obvious and everywhere. And the results are predictable: far too many people are lining up to buy a device that very few have seen. (See the picture, right, of a line forming in New York City four days before the product went on sale.)

It’s a buy-wave for a phone whose troubling issues and real costs were kept secret to almost the last moment.

Now, some self-disclosure: I haven’t touched the iPhone yet. I haven’t sniffed it, stroked it, slipped it in my pocket, or tried to download anything over its very slow Internet connection. I also haven’t tried to thumb-type yet on its slippery little glass face.

But that is precisely my point. Call me a skeptic or a realist: but I don’t intend to get swept along by any stampede or by the false logic that “lightening will strike twice.”Newton Handheld Computer from Apple

The iPod (it is said) remade the mobile music world (by advanced design and by transforming how music is bought). And so -- it is predicted -- the iPhone will do the same for portable phones.
Yeah? Don’t you have to prove that? Last season’s victories belongs to the last season.

Isn’t the ground littered with “paradigm-makers” that no one bought?

Do you remember Apple’s disastrous 1993 Newton handheld (right)? Probably not!

We are clearly at a moment of techno-fusion. All our new means of communications and entertainment will now cram into one meta-devices. Some clever gadget will merge phone, voicemail, mp3 player, video display, internet surfing, email, Instant Messaging, texting, document reading, and calendar. It will happen.

And the immediate question (for me, and for millions of other people) is “Who will get it right?”
In other words, this is not mainly about “technosexy,” “techno-cool” or the wow-factor of sophisticated software design. And it isn’t about the dubious privilege of slapping a $500 phone into a holster. (Is that status “chic” or “sucker”?)

I am not trying to repeat Sansa’s corporate “iSheep” campaign of a few years ago. But I do think there are other products and concepts worth considering – even in they don’t get much press. I think the Sansa Connect (for example) has done something radically new using WiFi that really should be included in the fusion mix. If new devices don’t smoothly tap into Internet radio, are they really getting the big picture?

Apple was once a hungry contender running on raw creative juice. It now looks more like “the next Microsoft” – a corporate juggernaut able to crank up massive ink and hype before the game even starts.

Read More In: News, Rumors & Trends

Discussion:    Add a Comment | Comments 1-3 of 3 | Latest Comment

June 28, 2007 2:43 PM

I may be out of line here, but I think if the iPhone had been out when PE was penning their big hit, they might have tabled the song entirely.  Who knows, they might actually remix the song and change the title after tomorrow.

If Apple had launched a next-gen iPod with this landscape, cover-flow, multi-touch interface -- without the phone and Internet features - it would still be a remarkable step forward.  Name one other phone that has a second feature as compelling as the iPod on this one.

My SansaConnect is laughing at all the iPods in my drawer!

June 28, 2007 3:30 PM

Steven Jones said: If Apple had launched a next-gen iPod with this landscape, cover-flow, multi-touch interface -- without the phone and Internet features - it would still be a remarkable step forward. Name one other phone that has a second feature as compelling as the iPod on this one.

The issue is not whether the iPhone has innovations -- I expect it has.

A lot of funk? Maybe. But still stuck in the middle of disfunctional.

The fact remains: it's a phone without a decent key pad.

Dave Pogue is one of my favorite technology writers, and he (unlike me) has been lucky enough to wander around with an iPhone in his pocket.

He summed up:

"The iPhone is revolutionary; it’s flawed. It’s substance; it’s style. It does things no phone has ever done before; it lacks features found even on the most basic phones.”

Ok. Then he makes this revealing observation:

"Making a call, though, can take as many as six steps: wake the phone, unlock its buttons, summon the Home screen, open the Phone program, view the Recent Calls or speed-dial list, and select a name. Call quality is only average, and depends on the strength of your AT&T signal."

Read that again... SIX STEPS.

Do we really want to do that (over and over) each day, each time we call?

It's all about the music, man.

June 28, 2007 6:01 PM

Any convergence device is going to have more steps than devices designed to do one thing. The iPhone was not designed as a telephone that can also play music and surf the web, it's more of a device that can play music, surf the web, make calls, and make Apple and AT&T a boatload of money.

I'm not an iHater, nor am I am blind to some of the advancements Apple has made with this device. It's a pretty slick device, but obviously has some drawbacks when compared to other products. If you just want to make and receive phone calls, the iPhone isn't for you. The free phone that has a monochrome screen and a keypad will do that just fine, and with less effort than the iPhone. Those who want the phone's other features will put up with the additional complexities, and just shrug it off. And if they don't want to put up with it, they'll go back to a regular phone and sell the iPhone on ebay.

Who is the iPhone for anyway? Well, it's for the person that wants an iPod, but doesn't want to carry both the pod and a phone at the same time. iPhone is for the person that wants to be hip and look chic, and for the person that wants to try something new... a whole new way of interacting with a device. Multi-touch is cool for many reasons, but not for others. Heavy texters and those wanting to only dial a number have no need for it, but navigating the device, music selection, and internet surfing will greatly benefit from this style of interface.

Many of the current complaints are about simple software limitations, and while it seems odd that Apple would launch a product without some of these basics included, it's important to remember that these limitations don't have to be permanent. Software can be upgraded, and I'd put down money that Apple will be updating the software on this phone to fill in the holes over the next six months. Of course, there's no guarantee these things will be added in, so I realize the importance of judging a product based on what it does now, not what it might do in the future.

Still, I'd complain more about the hardware limitations than the software. A non removable battery (that can only be replaced by Apple) is a huge turn off for me, especially given Apple's track record with batteries in the past. And worst, no doubt iPhone has the best mobile web browser in the market right now, but Apple's decision to intergrate EDGE over a 3G data option is the reason I wouldn't touch iPhone with a 10 foot pole. EDGE feels slow, because it is slow... especially compared to EVDO and the other 3G options. Internet on the go is becoming increasingly important, and I'd rather surf on a device that's got (dare I say) more modern technology for it's web connection. 

Plus, I'm not too keen on dropping 500 to 600 bucks on an EDGE phone with a two year contract. 

Mind Over Matt'er - Technology musings, opinion, and more straight from TechLore's head geek.

Discussion:    Add a Comment | Comments 1-3 of 3 | Latest Comment

Add Your Reply

(will not be displayed)

Email me when comments are added to this thread

 
 

Please log in or register to participate in this community!

Log In

Remember

Not a member? Sign up!

Did you forget your password?

You can also log in using OpenID.

close this window
close this window